What does imposed sentence mean

New Word List Word List. Save This Word! See synonyms for imposed on Thesaurus. We could talk until we're blue in the face about this quiz on words for the color "blue," but we think you should take the quiz and find out if you're a whiz at these colorful terms. Words nearby imposed importunacy , importunate , importune , importunity , impose , imposed , impose on , imposing , imposing stone , imposition , impossibility.

Words related to imposed appoint , levy , force , institute , require , introduce , order , foist , charge , place , promulgate , inflict , demand , put , establish , enforce , lay down , presume , visit , trespass. How to use imposed in a sentence The bank has been suffering from costs associated with a regulatory crackdown over its unethical sales practices, and the Fed has imposed strict limits on its growth.

The 21 best stocks to buy for Anne Sraders November 20, Fortune. Levels of Offenses Examples of felonies are murder, rape, burglary, and the sale of illegal drugs. Misdemeanors are less serious crimes, and are typically punishable by up to a year in county jail. Common misdemeanors include shoplifting, drunk driving, assault, and possession of an unregistered firearm.

State law of every state within the U. Inmates can receive early release under both systems of sentencing. A parole board will normally grant early release in an indeterminate system if inmates can show that they have rehabilitated themselves.

Which of the following is the best way to express the difference between indeterminate sentences and determinate sentences? A- Determinate sentences are set by a judge; indeterminate sentences are suggested by a counselor. The main problem with determinate sentencing is that, there is no flexibility to the punishment. An indeterminate sentence is a sentence that does not assign a set amount of jail time.

Critics argue that these determinate sentences have led to more people being sent to prison than ever before in the United States. This report presents tables which summarize the provisions included in the determinate sentencing laws of the 13 States which have adopted such laws.

District Director, F. Abbenante v. Butterfield, F. But see, Holzapfel v. Wyrsch, F. Laws ch. Note: This decision is mistaken. This attempt to rewrite history cannot survive scrutiny. We previously have held that when an alien's conviction is vacated for reasons other than procedural or substantive error, he remains convicted for immigration purposes. See, e. Gonzales, F. Other courts uniformly have hewed to this rationale. Holder, F. Att'y Gen. It necessarily follows that the vacation of a fine for reasons unrelated to procedural or substantive error does not dissipate the underlying conviction for purposes of section a 2 A ii.

The petitioner's case falls within this taxonomy. There is no indication in the record that his fine for shoplifting was vacated on account of either procedural or substantive error. To the contrary, the state court docket reflects that roughly five months after the fine was imposed, it was waived on recommendation of [the] Probation Dept. When the petitioner's counsel sought clarification regarding the final disposition, the state court wrote that the docket should reflect [a] guilty finding with no fines or costs.

The implication of these docket entries is pellucid: the state court, exercising clemency, waived the petitioner's fine at the behest of his probation officer. There is not the slightest hint that the waiver came about because of some legal infirmity in the shoplifting proceedings. Accordingly, the shoplifting conviction remains a formal judgment of guilt, 8 U.

This is mistaken because it confuses the requirements for an effective vacatur of a conviction a ground of legal invalidity , with an alteration in the sentence, which is effective for immigration purposes regardless of the reason for the sentence change.

Compare Matter of Pickering, 23 I. The consistent rule, until now, has been that it is the final state sentence that is binding on the immigration authorities, regardless of any reason given for a change in the sentence.

Attorney General of U. Lamer, 60 F. May 14, rejecting an argument that the top sentence of six months in pre-Booker Guidelines range controls over statutory maximum sentence in determining maximum sentence of prior felony for illegal re-entry sentencing purposes.